Sunday, March 15, 2009

The sinful absurdity of polygamy...

In some (thankfully only some) Christians, the mindset is that unless God directly and plainly said to an Old Testament personality something pertaining directly to their "sin" (so called today because of principles stated that magnify/clarify OT principles), that such behaviour need not be considered sinful. Their logic goes something like this regarding the practice of polygamy:

"They had a personal relationship with God and God made His will known to them, especially when it came to simple things, such as the number of wives they could have! Had he been displeased with their plural wives, He would have notified them I am positive, and we would know this today because it would be recorded in His Law-Word. It is not."

Sadly, this is faulty logic that will lead to the pits of hell. To illustrate, I want to examine a few incidents in the Bible.

1. Consider Lot and the occasion of the visit to him by 2 men (angels, directly from God, identified as so in Genesis 19:1)

We know the story, the men of Sodom came to Lot and demanded that he release the 2 so that they could have sexual relations with them. Notice Lot's response: (verse 8): "See now, I have two daughters who have not known a man; please, let me bring them out to you, and you may do to them as you wish; only do nothing to these men..." In other words, Lot offered to prostitute his 2 unmarried daughters. Nowhere in the following verses is it indicated that the angels objected to this offer, or gave any negative connotation to this act of Lot's.

Therefore, since the logic used by the above mentioned fools would indicate that since Lot received no (direct) condemnation, it is approved by God that fathers prostitute their daughters, especially in the light of the fact that Lot is referred to as "just" (righteous) - 2 Peter 2:7.

2. Consider Lot (again) with his 2 surviving daughters and the incest recorded in Genesis 19:31-38. Again, the logic used by the above mentioned fools would indicate that since neither Lot nor his daughters received no (direct) condemnation, it is approved by God that fathers have incestuous relationships with their daughters, especially when they are drunk (Lot received no condemnation for being drunk) and that it is also permissible to be so drunken as to be totally blotted out from knowing what is going on about you. So drunkenness is a "bonus" added in this incident, since God didn't speak to Lot about it. (Ephesians 5:18 didn't come till later, but hey, we must rely on Lot's example because we can't give any additional 'weight' to the Ephesians reference...)

3. Consider the case of Jephthah (Judges 11:29-40), who in verse 1 it is said, "Then the Spirit of the LORD came upon Jephthah..." went on to make a stupid (in my humble opinion) vow. As it turned out, the vow obligated him to sacrifice his daughter by burning her to death as an offering. Now, it must be noted that commentators over the years have disputed over whether or not he actually did burn her up, or did he regulate her life in solitude. Nevertheless, using the logic of the above mentioned fools, we have an indication that since Jephthah received no (direct) condemnation, it is approved by God that fathers burn their daughters as sacrifices. (Leviticus 27:1-5) notwithstanding, because, hey, we must rely on Jephthah's example because we can't give any additional 'weight' to the Leviticus example.

Look, absurd is absurd. Twisted logic is nothing but twisted logic. It is sinful, and morally wrong. The above mentioned fools need to repent, lest they fall into the condemnation of Matthew 7:23: "And then I will declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness!’"

and/or the condemnation found in Jude 1:3b-7: "I found it necessary to write to you exhorting you to contend earnestly for the faith which was once for all delivered to the saints. For certain men have crept in unnoticed, who long ago were marked out for this condemnation, ungodly men, who turn the grace of our God into lewdness and deny the only Lord God and our Lord Jesus Christ. But I want to remind you, though you once knew this, that the Lord, having saved the people out of the land of Egypt, afterward destroyed those who did not believe. And the angels who did not keep their proper domain, but left their own abode, He has reserved in everlasting chains under darkness for the judgment of the great day; as Sodom and Gomorrah, and the cities around them in a similar manner to these, having given themselves over to sexual immorality and gone after strange flesh, are set forth as an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire." (emphasis mine.)

9 comments:

  1. Well, I for one am glad that you believe the Bible - that polygamy is not God's plan for married couples.

    I also appreciate the fact that we must read the WHOLE counsel of the law in order to understand and discern the truth. God doesn't tell us everything that is wrong. He DOES tell us that everything we do is tainted with sin. That's why we need a Saviour! PTL!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yes, we often must ask Him to save us... from ourselves!

    Scripture has never been meant for "private interpretation" ( 2Peter 1:20), but as corrupt sinners, don't we all try to do so - that is pick an issue or condition, and be selective in which Scriptures we use to validate or justify our (wrong) interpretation?

    I believe the re-emergence of such false doctrines is only the beginning. We are to be ever vigilant (1Peter 5:8) and resist such mockeries of the Word. May God the Father, by the Son, through the power of the Holy Spirit, make us abe to withstand such assaults. (Ephesians 6:13-20)

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think what Pastor Bob said yesterday while teaching the Systematics course was interestingly applicable here.

    He was talking about the heresies that loomed up, which forced the Council of Nicea to gather and form a creed.

    Pastor Bob said, "Heresies are helpful in this way: they force us to go back to Scripture to find the truth, and to stand upon it."

    When everything's going "just fine", our armour becomes rusty and our sword is put away and forgotten.

    With something such as this, I think it is God purging the dross from His church. The faithful will remain, and be rebuked in such a way that makes them repent of their lukewarm ways. God willing, we may turn back to Him and take a stand on His word once more.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Yes, Linda, you are right, BUT it is also fundamental that as 2Timothy 2:15 says, we must "Be diligent to present yourself approved to God, a worker who does not need to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth."

    If we do not "rightly divide" (teach the truth rightly and correctly) we can fall into diverse flagrances of His revealed word.

    ReplyDelete
  5. True.

    Which is why I'm thankful for all of those in my life who do rightly divide the word of truth.

    Here's a quote I read today (and saved to my computer because I'm like that):

    [Dislike of dogma] is an epidemic which is just now doing great harm, and specially among young people.... It produces what I must venture to call...a "jelly-fish" Christianity in the land: that is, a Christianity without bone, or muscle, or power. A jelly-fish...is a pretty and graceful object when it floats in the sea, contracting and expanding like a little, delicate, transparent umbrella. Yet the same jelly-fish, when cast on the shore, is a mere helpless lump, without capacity for movement, self-defense, or self-preservation. Alas! It is a vivid type of much of the religion of this day, of which the leading principle is, "No dogma, no distinct tenets, no positive doctrine." We have hundreds of "jelly-fish" clergymen, who seem not to have a single bone in their body of divinity. They have not definite opinions; they belong to no school or party; they are so afraid of "extreme views" that they have no views at all. We have thousands of "jelly-fish" sermons preached every year, sermons without an edge, or a point, or a corner, smooth as billiard balls, awakening no sinner, and edifying no saint. We have Legions of "jelly-fish" young men annually turned out from our Universities, armed with a few scraps of second-hand philosophy, who think it a mark of cleverness and intellect to have no decided opinions about anything in religion, and to be utterly unable to make up their minds as to what is Christian truth. They live apparently in a state of suspense, like Mohamet's fabled coffin, hanging between heaven and earth...and last, and worst of all, we have myriads of "jelly-fish" worshippers-respectable Church-going people, who have no distinct and definite views about any point in theology. They cannot discern things that differ, any more than color-blind people can distinguish colors. They think everybody is right and nobody wrong, everything is true and nothing is false, all sermons are good and none are bad, every clergyman is sound and no clergyman is unsound. They are "tossed to and fro, like children, by every wind of doctrine"; often carried away by any new excitement and sensational movement; ever ready for new things, because they have no firm grasp on the old; and utterly unable to "render a reason of the hope that is in them." ...Never was it so important for laymen to hold systematic views of truth, and for ordained ministers to "enunciate dogma" very clearly and distinctly in their teaching.

    ~

    Enunciate that dogma! Woot woot! Go Go Go!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Jelly fish? Nah, a better condemnation would be "cowards and slow-bellies, clouds without water, carried about by the winds; late autumn trees without fruit, twice dead, pulled up by the roots; raging waves of the sea, foaming up their own shame; wandering stars for whom is reserved the blackness of darkness forever..."

    Jude 1:12 (except for cowards & slow-bellies!)

    gotta' love Jude...

    ReplyDelete
  7. Something I used to illestrate the verses in the Bible saying "sexual immorality" is:
    "It's like saying (you cannot have ice cream)instead of quoting all the specific flavors."
    I would say Christians need to look for the correct form of marriage, instead of looking for ways out of the one man one wife marriage.

    Do we not fail to love one wife as Christ loved the church?
    If they can tell me what polygamy profits(other then the satisfying of mans lusts) in our service of Christ, then I might give them the time of day.
    But as of now all I see is the misuse of Gods word in justifying a sin.

    Good post, I like squashing an idiots logic.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Yeah, Daniel. That's what I think, too. Dude says to himself, "That chickie is hawt. I want to have her. So, I'll marry her, because the bible doesn't say it's wrong, and then I get her all to myself."

    It's all about the lust. And, the (IMO) wrong idea that you need 100+ children to take over the world. ;)

    ReplyDelete
  9. Don't need 100+ kids - only 12...

    ReplyDelete